Summary, Analysis, And Persuasion

Summary , Analysis , And PersuasionIn Evan s Two Moms , Anna Quindlen illustrates that preventing two stack from reservation their commitment to each some other public and according to uprightness because they have the analogous charge up is sozzled . Quindlen begins her essay by drawing the recent instances of victories for alike-sex marriages : an approved adoption to a lesbian couple , approved guardianship to a lesbian partner in crime for another couple , equal incentives for heterosexual and homosexual couples . Quindlen wherefore lists examples of the in exceptice of society and the justice system to same-sex couples by refuse rights br and privileges married couples enjoy just because they do not fit the man-woman definition of a coupleQuindlen draws a par aloneel betwixt how twenty five years ago interracial marriages were seen as taboo and ar now considered normal as compared to how same sex marriages are seen today . She ends her piece by suggesting that perchance twenty five years from now , we will acknowledge the idea of barring same sex marriages just as absurdBut why would same sex marriages cease to be absurd just because of the passage of timeQuidlen subtly argues for the validity of same sex marriage and to persuade the contributor to take a pitying stance on the issue simplifies the problem to the basics . Quidlen apply simple words to show her point and the simplicity of it every , first when she wroteEvan . Evan s mom . Evan s other mom . A claw , a psychologist , a pediatrician . A familyand then Fran and I chose to get married for the same reasons that any two people do said the lawyer who was fired in tabun , we fell in jockey we wanted to spend our lives in concert Pretty simpleHer use of value-laden words like family and love take on well in hitting a nerve because it makes the reader wonder why does society prevent these people to live their own family and love each other .

Everybody wants a family , everybody wants love . Why drive out t they have those ? Why focus on the sexual practice and not on the more important set of love and family Quindlen is in fact saying that the issue with same-sex marriages can be stripped down to a basic-human level wherein gender need not play a role . So what if they are both men , if they are both women , she seems to be saying . They love one another , they are unstrained to commit , they desperately want to start a family , all of which even heterosexual couples have problems on alsoBy focusing on the shared values of love and commitment , Quindlen puts forward a powerful argument - that same sex couples are just like everybody else , how come they are treated differently ? The stinkpot line for Quindlen is that gender should not be an issue . same sex marriages should not be tagged as same sex marriages but rather be recognized as marriages between two people loving each other , periodQuindlen does not take into consideration two factors : that homosexual relationships are different...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .