The Novel -"A Hero of Our Time"

To the author, Pechorin is a symptom of a sick clubhouse. It is a parliamentary procedure without direction or purpose, and Pechorin represents that society as he goes about doing whatever he wants to do without concern for the disastrous results of his selfishness.

The other main characters in the take hold, including the fabricator who opens the book, old Maksimich, the girl Pechorin kidnaps, and Vulich, who duels Pechorin, are in the book in the main to help us see different aspects of the character of Pechorin. The main conflict in the book is betwixt the character of Pechorin and the society in which he lives. In a broader sense, the conflict is between a man who behaves without morality and the average reader's belief in moral behavior. As the book is presented, there is no veritable "solution" to this conflict, as the author himself makes clear. Lermontov, referring to himself, writes that

He merely frame it amusing to draw modern man such as he understood him, such as he met him---too often, unfortunately, for him and you. attend to it that the disease has been pointed out; goodness knows how to cure it (2).

Of course, one world power say that the disease has been cured by the death of Pechorin in the duel, still that would be incorrect. Lermontov is showing that Pechorin is only a sign of the zodiac of a social disease. The death of Pechorin does non solve the main conflict which is in all of society. Society wants people to behave, exactly the society as portrayed by

In these novels, it is clear that Turgenev is far more interested with creating characters and atmosphere than with creating masterful and spellbinding plots. In that sense, he is actually a "rougeer of action." The world he creates and the characters who live in that world seem to be slightly unreal, despite the capital detail and care he puts into them. He does not paint people who are very realistic, but the people he does paint with words are very finely drawn. This is not to say that Turgenev is unaware of what he is doing in painting characters who are not very realistic or recognizable valet being beings to the modern reader. He himself sees that they are in many cases dilettante people who are concerned with the surface aspects of life.

This is exactly what he wants to show---that they have lost a deep connection with life and with themselves. His characters are stuck in their superficiality, and Turgenev writes as a social critic who wishes that his people were more real and more in tinct with the passion of life and love.

Readers who fail to see the humor in this passage will conclude that Gogol does not love his characters, or that he even hates them and has no apply that they can transfer for the better. Can we really say that he believes in humankind goodness and has faith in God because he concludes his book on a hopeful note, when he fills so much(prenominal) of his work with negative portrayals. It can be fairly argued that Gogol's hope for humanity is overshadowed by his negative descriptions. However, it can also be argued that the humor and great details of his descriptions are signs of his deep substance for human beings. In fact, Gogol knows that if he is to convince his reader that human beings must change, he must first show them to be in need of that change. This is why he shows them at their worst---so that he can conclude that they must become better, with God's help.

Whatever you whitethorn say, the body depends on the soul. . . Think not of dead souls, but of your own
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.