Difference Between Standard Medical Care and Chiropractic Care

One of the most interest concerns rough chiropractic treat is the fact that it approaches the art of healing from a holistic, rather than a symptomological frame of reference. The underlying assumption in chiropractic medicine is that all the nerves of the personify open a tangential point along the spine, and consequently all ailments and afflictions may be helped, albeit in a limited fashion, by the utilisation of the human spine. Some have even offered the thesis that the in truth nature of the medical profession feels threatened by chiropractic treatment, oddly since it is often more effective than traditional treatment itself (Hafferty, 1988, pp. 202-212). In other words,

Chiropractic is based on the theory that many disorders of the body are traceable to a misalignment of the spinal-column and a concomitant break of the nervous system. This is a very old idea, and intuitively it makes a good deal of sense. The spinal cord is a piece of ground along which messages are carried to organs throughout the body; reparation the pathway could well affect the transfer of information and, subsequently, the health of the organs (Shell, 1988, p. 78).

The antagonism runs deep, however, and even family physicians indicate a 66 percent level of discomfort in chiropractic medicine, while 57 percent admitted that they had occasionally sent patients in for chiropractic treatment that had injuries or illn

Appeals court rules A.M.A. acted against chiropractors. (1990, February 9). New York Times, p. A12.

Hafferty, F.W. (1988). Theories at the crossroads. Millbank Quarterly, 66, 202-234.

Shell, E.R. (1988, February). The getting of respect. Atlantic, 261, 78-80.

Glasser, M. & Pelto, G.H.. (1980). The medical merry-go- round. Pleasantville: Redgrave.

On the other hand, the physical healer is concerned more with retraining the patient after an detriment or illness, and less with preventative medicine, or, in fact, the actual curative for the particular ailment.

The very nature and role of the physical therapist is thus not to prescribe a treatment program, still rather to implement the program as prescribed by the medical doctor to attain what may be termed previously established objectives.

Again, one of the major arguments against chiropractic treatment is that there is no scientific way to establish proof for subluxation because as yet, rawness cannot be measured in any quantitative manner. Moreover, subluxations do not appear on x-rays, and there seems to be a lack of substantial data to indicate that manipulations of the spine have any permanent effect. However, it should likewise be noted that about 11 million people a year hear help from a chiropractor, most for low back pain, with an overpower percentage comprehending that they feel the treatment was successful. Additionally, many report that their chiropractic treatments were far more successful than the more traditional forms of medicine (Shell, 1988, p. 78).

Chiropractic medicine works a bit differently, especially in its theoretical aspects. In fact,

Moore, L.J. (1981, June 29). Beyond the limits of traditional medicine. U.S. News & instauration Report, 54-55.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.